[swift-evolution] [RFC] Associated type inference

Xiaodi Wu xiaodi.wu at gmail.com
Sat Dec 2 15:15:41 CST 2017

On Sat, Dec 2, 2017 at 2:30 PM, Howard Lovatt via swift-evolution <
swift-evolution at swift.org> wrote:

> Definitely in favour of doing something, I always define the associated
> types since I have had so much trouble with the inference.
> Personally I would prefer just 1 and 2 and forget 3. I know this would
> break a lot of code, but I think we should do that because it is the lesser
> of the evils.

As Doug wrote, an approach that's essentially that was reviewed and
rejected in SE-0108. We already know that it's not acceptable to a great
proportion of the community.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.swift.org/pipermail/swift-evolution/attachments/20171202/1d68e669/attachment.html>

More information about the swift-evolution mailing list