[swift-evolution] Synthesizing Equatable, Hashable, and Comparable for tuple types
Mike Kluev
mike.kluev at gmail.com
Sat Nov 25 18:17:22 CST 2017
On 25 November 2017 at 23:39, Xiaodi Wu <xiaodi.wu at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 25, 2017 at 5:21 PM, Mike Kluev <mike.kluev at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 25 November 2017 at 23:07, Xiaodi Wu <xiaodi.wu at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Not sure what you’re asking. Equatable is a protocol.
>>>
>>
>> that's the point. i mean, if user writes this:
>>
>> extension (Equatable, Equatable) : Equatable
>>
>> what *else* could he mean other than this:
>>
>> extension <T: Equatable, R: Equatable> (T, R) : Equatable
>>
>
> No, it would mean extending the concrete type `(Equatable, Equatable)`
> (which has other roadblocks to becoming possible because Equatable has Self
> requirements).
>
>
>> and if it is indeed the only reasonable meaning we can think of - i'd say
>> the first notation is nicer.
>>
>>
>>> For a protocol P, (P, P) is a concrete type with two elements each of
>>> existential type P.
>>>
>>
>> this part i do not understand. protocol is not an existential type. or is
>> it?
>>
>
> Ah. You seem to be unfamiliar with protocol existentials. Protocols
> (currently, only those without Self or associated type requirements, for
> various implementation reasons) are themselves types. For example, you can
> write:
>
> ```
> protocol P { }
> extension Int : P { }
> let x: P = 42
> ```
>
thanks, indeed i was totally unaware of this. can't even find it in the
language reference.
if i decipher this correctly, the above example with Equatable is probably
"fine" (because Equatable has self requirement) but in other cases it won't
be fine.
> In this example, x is of type `P`, not of type `Int`. Let's clarify the
> difference:
>
> ```
> extension Array where Element == P {
> func hi() {
> print("Hello")
> }
> }
>
> extension Array where Element : P {
> func hi() {
> print("World!")
> }
> }
>
> let y: [P] = [x]
> let z: [Int] = [x as Int]
>
> y.hi() // Prints "Hello"
> z.hi() // Prints "World!"
> ```
>
> Moreover, if we do not write the first `extension Array`, then `y.hi()`
> doesn't compile. This helps to illustrate that P does not conform to itself.
>
thanks for example. too subtle feature imho. i never thought protocol could
be a type on it's own, makes the whole story more complex.
Mike
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.swift.org/pipermail/swift-evolution/attachments/20171126/69e6733f/attachment.html>
More information about the swift-evolution
mailing list