[swift-evolution] SE-184 Improved Pointers
Andrew Trick
atrick at apple.com
Fri Aug 18 22:42:59 CDT 2017
> On Aug 18, 2017, at 5:36 PM, Taylor Swift <kelvin13ma at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Should the immutable buffer pointer types also get deallocate()?
Both UnsafePointer and UnsafeBufferPointer should get deallocate. The Raw API already has those methods.
-Andy
> On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 7:55 PM, Andrew Trick <atrick at apple.com <mailto:atrick at apple.com>> wrote:
>
>> On Aug 15, 2017, at 9:47 PM, Taylor Swift via swift-evolution <swift-evolution at swift.org <mailto:swift-evolution at swift.org>> wrote:
>>
>> Implementation is here: https://github.com/apple/swift/pull/11464 <https://github.com/apple/swift/pull/11464>
>>
>> On Sat, Aug 12, 2017 at 8:23 PM, Taylor Swift <kelvin13ma at gmail.com <mailto:kelvin13ma at gmail.com>> wrote:
>> I’ve revised the proposal based on what I learned from trying to implement these changes. I think it’s worth tacking the existing methods that take Sequences at the same time as this actually makes the design a bit simpler.
>> <https://gist.github.com/kelvin13/5edaf43dcd3d6d9ed24f303fc941214c <https://gist.github.com/kelvin13/5edaf43dcd3d6d9ed24f303fc941214c>>
>>
>> The previous version <https://gist.github.com/kelvin13/1b8ae906be23dff22f7a7c4767f0c907> of this document ignored the generic initialization methods on UnsafeMutableBufferPointer and UnsafeMutableRawBufferPointer, leaving them to be overhauled at a later date, in a separate proposal. Instead, this version of the proposal leverages those existing methods to inform a more compact API design which has less surface area, and is more future-proof since it obviates the need to design and add another (redundant) set of protocol-oriented pointer APIs later.
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 12:52 PM, Taylor Swift <kelvin13ma at gmail.com <mailto:kelvin13ma at gmail.com>> wrote:
>> Since Swift 5 just got opened up for proposals, SE-184 Improved Pointers is ready for community review, and I encourage everyone to look it over and provide feedback. Thank you!
>> <https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/0184-improved-pointers.md <https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/0184-improved-pointers.md>>
>>
>
>
> Would you mind adding a deallocate method to (nonmutable) UnsafePointer/UnsafeBufferPointer to take care of
> [SR-3309](https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-3309 <https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-3309>)?
>
> There’s simply nothing in the memory model that requires mutable memory for deallocation.
>
> It fits right in with this proposal and hardly seems worth a separate one.
>
> -Andy
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.swift.org/pipermail/swift-evolution/attachments/20170818/d356138f/attachment.html>
More information about the swift-evolution
mailing list