[swift-evolution] TrigonometricFloatingPoint/MathFloatingPoint protocol?
Taylor Swift
kelvin13ma at gmail.com
Mon Jul 31 13:10:32 CDT 2017
I’m not sure why only the stdlib is inlineable and specializable, but I
believe it has something to do with ABI. I’m not an ABI expert though. I
strongly disagree that a Swift Math library should be delegated to a third
party. Math is “common” enough that there should really only be one
“standard” implementation of it, under the direction of the Swift Project;
we don’t want 5 competing third party Vector standards.
On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 2:02 PM, Hooman Mehr <hooman at mac.com> wrote:
> I know. I hear you. I have some special arrangmnents to keep such things
> manageable, and I am not happy about how things stand right now.
>
> What I am hoping to open up stdlib special compiler mode to other
> (low-level) libraries and also letting such libraries gain optimizations
> similar to stdlib when included in a project.
>
> So, instead of putting things in stdlib, I want stdlib’s special
> privileges being made available to a certain category of third-party or
> internal modules.
>
>
> On Jul 31, 2017, at 10:54 AM, Taylor Swift <kelvin13ma at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Isn’t the point of standard inlineable library module to prevent the need
> to copy and paste code like this into every project? Currently I have a
> “math.swift” file I copy and paste into all of my projects, and since I
> occasionally update it, there exists about 15 different versions of it
> floating around, so I know this is not a sustainable practice.
>
> On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 1:45 PM, Hooman Mehr <hooman at mac.com> wrote:
>
>> I prefer an approach that preserves how I am used to seeing math
>> expressions. I use this myself:
>>
>> protocol FloatingPointMath: FloatingPoint
>> {
>> static func sqrt(_ value: Self) -> Self
>>
>> static func sin(_ value: Self) -> Self
>> static func cos(_ value: Self) -> Self
>> static func tan(_ value: Self) -> Self
>> static func asin(_ value: Self) -> Self
>> static func acos(_ value: Self) -> Self
>> static func atan(_ value: Self) -> Self
>>
>> static func ln(_ value: Self) -> Self
>> static func log(_ value: Self, base: Self) -> Self
>> static func pow(_ value: Self, exponent:Self) -> Self
>> static func exp(_ value: Self) -> Self
>> }
>>
>> It does not pollute the global namespace and gives nice contextual
>> auto-completion. And I don’t want it in the standard library: I only add
>> the file when I need it. (it is not a separate module for optimization
>> reasons).
>>
>> On Jul 31, 2017, at 10:29 AM, Taylor Swift via swift-evolution <
>> swift-evolution at swift.org> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 1:23 PM, Adrian Zubarev <
>> adrian.zubarev at devandartist.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I’m not sure how I would feel about this. To be honest I’d avoid such
>>> additional changes from the stdlib, because they really don’t belong there.
>>> Instead some `Math` module/package would be a better fit than clustering
>>> everything into stdlib until we end up also adding UI stuff.
>>>
>>> Furthermore, I don’t think a function would make any sense here. It
>>> really should be a computed property.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> I think a standard Math module would be a good idea, but only if it
>> benefits from the same inlining and specialization as the standard library.
>> Also squareRoot() should be moved to the Math module if it is ever created.
>>
>>
>>> Am 31. Juli 2017 um 19:03:49, Taylor Swift via swift-evolution (
>>> swift-evolution at swift.org) schrieb:
>>>
>>> How would people feel about adding a protocol
>>>
>>> protocol MathFloatingPoint:FloatingPoint
>>> {
>>> func sin() -> Self
>>> func cos() -> Self
>>> func tan() -> Self
>>> func asin() -> Self
>>> func acos() -> Self
>>> func atan() -> Self
>>>
>>> func ln() -> Self
>>> func log(base:Self) -> Self
>>> func pow(exponent:Self) -> Self
>>> func exp() -> Self
>>> }
>>>
>>> to the standard library? Float and Double would then be made to conform
>>> by default using Swift implementations instead of having to import Glibc /
>>> Darwin and writing the extensions, depending on platform.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> swift-evolution mailing list
>>> swift-evolution at swift.org
>>> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> swift-evolution mailing list
>> swift-evolution at swift.org
>> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
>>
>>
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.swift.org/pipermail/swift-evolution/attachments/20170731/0e6e26d8/attachment.html>
More information about the swift-evolution
mailing list