[swift-evolution] Xcode Fix-It action for returning closures
Mike Choi
mkchoi212 at icloud.com
Sat Jul 15 19:56:30 CDT 2017
A bug report has been filed under SR-5455.
Thanks for the suggestions!
On 2017년 7월 16일 AM 9:52 +0900, Félix Cloutier <felixcca at yahoo.ca>, wrote:
> AFAIK, fix-it is driven by the Swift compiler/source kit.
>
> > Le 13 juil. 2017 à 23:17, Saagar Jha via swift-evolution <swift-evolution at swift.org> a écrit :
> >
> > You should probably file a Radar for this, since Xcode isn’t part of the Swift project.
> >
> > Saagar Jha
> >
> > > On Jul 13, 2017, at 19:46, iCloud via swift-evolution <swift-evolution at swift.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Swift community,
> > >
> > > I was wondering if we have considered adding support for providing Xcode automatic fix-it’s for closures being returned from a function.
> > >
> > > For example, here is an incorrect version of a function that requires two `@escaping` keywords to be inserted.
> > >
> > > func mapping <A, B, C> (f: (A) -> (B)) -> ((C, B) -> (C)) -> ((C, A) -> (C))
> > >
> > > Despite the complexity, the compiler manages to catch two errors.
> > >
> > > 1. Closure use of non-escaping parameter `f` may allow it to escape
> > > a. Automatic Fix-it by doing `f: @escaping (A) - > (B)`
> > >
> > > 2. Closure use of non-escaping parameter `reducer` may allow it to escape
> > > b. No Fix-it provided <————
> > >
> > > As you see above, the two places where a compile-time error occurred had the same exact problem; they both needed a `@escaping`. However, while the function parameter was offered an automatic fix-it, the nested closure being returned was not.
> > >
> > > Here’s the correct version of the function.
> > >
> > > func mapping <A, B, C> (f: @escaping (A) -> (B)) -> (@escaping ((C, B) -> (C))) -> ((C, A) -> (C)) {
> > > return { reducer in
> > > return { accum, input in
> > > reducer(accum, f(input))
> > > }
> > > }
> > > }
> > >
> > > I know this is a small feature for a very specific use case but I think it could help make Xcode a little smarter :D
> > > Thanks for reading!
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > swift-evolution mailing list
> > > swift-evolution at swift.org
> > > https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > swift-evolution mailing list
> > swift-evolution at swift.org
> > https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.swift.org/pipermail/swift-evolution/attachments/20170716/ea59916f/attachment.html>
More information about the swift-evolution
mailing list