[swift-evolution] [Proposal][Discussion] Deprecate Tuple Shuffles
Xiaodi Wu
xiaodi.wu at gmail.com
Fri May 5 02:59:05 CDT 2017
On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 2:56 AM, Rien <Rien at balancingrock.nl> wrote:
>
> > On 05 May 2017, at 09:31, Xiaodi Wu via swift-evolution <
> swift-evolution at swift.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 2:28 AM, Adrian Zubarev <
> adrian.zubarev at devandartist.com> wrote:
> > I’m not arguing to remove all labels in Swift. Labels are great, this is
> a fact for sure. The point I was trying to make is that labels in tuples
> how either a meaning or not at all.
> >
> > // This is a shortcut for the tuple type `(x: Int, y: Int)`
> > let foo = (x: 0, y: 0)
> >
> > // In this case the labels are only used for description,
> > // they do not server any benefit here are most likely redundant
> > let (x: x, y: y) = foo
> >
> > Labels elsewhere are a different story and I do support the cosmetic
> addition Chris Lattner sketched out here: https://lists.swift.org/
> pipermail/swift-evolution-announce/2016-July/000233.html
> >
> > However this is about closures and not tuples, I don’t think this would
> anyhow affect the removal of labels in tuple destructuring.
> >
> > Plus I don’t see this to create an inconsistent in Swift, because as I
> already said, labels in tuple destructuring are useless.
> >
> > How come? I just illustrated their use. They help humans write correct
> code by allowing the compiler to check an assertion that the human knows
> which labels go with which positions in the tuple.
>
> True, but the ability to define your own labels (instead of the API
> developer defining them for you) can make your code more readable. and
> hence maintainable.
>
I'm not sure I understand what you're suggesting here. Can you clarify?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.swift.org/pipermail/swift-evolution/attachments/20170505/b50bbc44/attachment.html>
More information about the swift-evolution
mailing list