[swift-evolution] [Review #2] SE-0161: Smart KeyPaths: Better Key-Value Coding for Swift
brad.hilton.nw at gmail.com
Thu Apr 6 13:14:24 CDT 2017
Yes. I'd prefer to keep unapplied method references the same and do
properties the same way IMHO.
On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 12:05 PM, Douglas Gregor <dgregor at apple.com> wrote:
> On Apr 6, 2017, at 11:01 AM, Brad Hilton <brad.hilton.nw at gmail.com> wrote:
> -1. Not a huge fan of the back slash. Doesn’t make sense considering we
> can refer to unapplied method references without the backslash. Maybe we
> can settle on some unified syntax for both? How about Person.name.get /
> Person.name.set for getter/setter references.
> Did you read the core team’s commentary on unapplied method references?
> - Doug
> Hello Swift community,
> The second review of SE-0161 "Smart KeyPaths: Better Key-Value Coding for
> Swift" begins now and runs through April 9, 2017. The revised proposal is
> available here:
> The core team’s feedback from the first review of this proposal can be
> viewed at:
> Reviews are an important part of the Swift evolution process. All reviews
> should be sent to the swift-evolution mailing list at
> or, if you would like to keep your feedback private, directly to the
> review manager. When replying, please try to keep the proposal link at the
> top of the message:
> Proposal link:
> Reply text
> Other replies
> goes into a review?
> The goal of the review process is to improve the proposal under review
> through constructive criticism and, eventually, determine the direction of
> Swift. When writing your review, here are some questions you might want to
> answer in your review:
> What is your evaluation of the proposal?
> Is the problem being addressed significant enough to warrant a change to
> Does this proposal fit well with the feel and direction of Swift?
> If you have used other languages or libraries with a similar feature, how
> do you feel that this proposal compares to those?
> How much effort did you put into your review? A glance, a quick reading,
> or an in-depth study?
> More information about the Swift evolution process is available at
> Thank you,
> Review Manager
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the swift-evolution