[swift-evolution] [Pitch] Add an all algorithm to Sequence

Ricardo Parada rparada at mac.com
Fri Mar 31 17:12:02 CDT 2017

I agree. 

> On Mar 31, 2017, at 5:32 PM, Robert Bennett via swift-evolution <swift-evolution at swift.org> wrote:
> I'm don't think we need all(equal:).
> 1) For a host of reasons, having a single signature for a function name is better than having multiple signatures when the single signature is capable enough.
> 2) A list containing a single distinct element is not a special enough case to check for to warrant its own function signature.
> all(equal:) can be replicated easily enough with nums.all { $0 == 9 }. Unlike all(equals:), this is extendible to non-Equatable types with equatable members.
> _______________________________________________
> swift-evolution mailing list
> swift-evolution at swift.org
> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution

More information about the swift-evolution mailing list