[swift-evolution] Pitch: Partial Implementations

[Matthew Johnson]

Sent from my iPhone

> On Mar 23, 2017, at 2:47 PM, Charles Srstka <cocoadev at charlessoft.com> wrote:
> 
>> On Mar 23, 2017, at 2:45 PM, Matthew Johnson <matthew at anandabits.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Sure, but this does effectively violate lexical scope boundaries as they exist in the original source.
> 
> If the yeas have it on SE-0159, and “private” is turned into “fileprivate”, the lexical scope boundaries of *everything* will be violated as they exist in the original source.

Not exactly  We wouldn't be able to talk about them in the access control system at all.

My point is that they would no longer be lexical scopes but something else.  This is not a judgement, only an observation.


> 
> Charles
> 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.swift.org/pipermail/swift-evolution/attachments/20170323/a549e646/attachment.html>