[swift-evolution] [swift-evolution-announce] [Review] SE-0156: Class and Subtype existentials

[David Hart]

> On 28 Feb 2017, at 22:19, Jordan Rose via swift-evolution <swift-evolution at swift.org> wrote:
> 
> [Proposal: https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/0156-subclass-existentials.md <https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/0156-subclass-existentials.md>]
> 
> Well-written, good job, useful feature, long-since-needed-because-of-ObjC, +1.
> 
> One nitpick:
> 
>> This proposal merges the concepts of `class` and `AnyObject`, which now have the same meaning: they represent an existential for classes. To get rid of the duplication, we suggest only keeping `AnyObject` around. To reduce source-breakage to a minimum, `class` could be redefined as `typealias class = AnyObject` and give a deprecation warning on `class` for the first version of Swift this proposal is implemented in. Later, `class` could be removed in a subsequent version of Swift.
> 
> 'class' is a keyword, so we don't get to drop the special parsing no matter what. We can still deprecate it, but I wouldn't bother trying to jam it into a typealias.

Yes. I only meant to drop its meaning as a class-type constraint.

> Jordan
> _______________________________________________
> swift-evolution mailing list
> swift-evolution at swift.org
> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.swift.org/pipermail/swift-evolution/attachments/20170228/cdca5723/attachment.html>