[swift-evolution] [Proposal Draft] Remove open Access Modifier
Joanna Carter
joanna at carterconsulting.org.uk
Wed Feb 22 05:27:48 CST 2017
> What I have done for this case is have a protocol with several private conforming Structs, and then wrap it all in a public final class which wraps a boxed instance of one of the conformers.
>
> Here is some code: https://gist.github.com/jonhull/b9cd8a50abca16ea49eade2c91edf8a2
I notice that you declare several private (fileprivate ?) types in the same file as the type that uses them.
Since we are able to nest types, why wouldn't that be a better solution to the "need" for fileprivate to hiding of related types instead of using the file scope?
e.g.
public final class Source
{
private struct ConstantSource { }
private struct OrderedSource { }
private struct RandomOrderedSource { }
func useConstant()
{
let _ = ConstantSource()
}
func useOrdered()
{
let _ = OrderedSource()
}
func useRandomOrdered()
{
let _ = RandomOrderedSource()
}
}
I suppose, having got used to using nested types in C# is maybe why I find it hard to understand why we need the 'fileprivate' scope.
--
Joanna Carter
Carter Consulting
More information about the swift-evolution
mailing list