[swift-evolution] [Draft] Fix Private Access Levels
brent at architechies.com
Tue Feb 21 09:18:01 CST 2017
> On Feb 21, 2017, at 5:36 AM, Matthew Johnson <matthew at anandabits.com> wrote:
> This is true for lexical scoping, but I'd also like to see scoped be parameterized to take the name of a containing scope, such as a containing submodule. This would be a powerful tool that allows sibling submodules to collaborate with each other. It is similar to allowing extensions of different types collaborate within a file, but at a larger level of granularity.
If I correctly understand what you seem to be suggesting, that would mean that access levels would be, ordered from narrowest access to widest, something like:
Having the same keyword appear in two very different places in that list seems...less than ideal.
More information about the swift-evolution