[swift-evolution] [Proposal][Discussion] Modular Swift

Robert Widmann devteam.codafi at gmail.com
Tue Feb 21 01:14:02 CST 2017

Sounds distressingly anti-modular!

Really, these kinds of hypotheticals can be addressed when the need arises.  For now it's a hypothetical fear about a hypothetical issue that isn't expressible and highly discouraged by this system - why produce an inverted dependency when you could simply rebalance the module by moving the declaration into a more appropriate scope?  I can assure you, the proposal seeks compatibility with the existing access control modifiers, not to have to contort them to fit its own goals.

~Robert Widmann

2017/02/21 2:07、Jonathan Hull <jhull at gbis.com> のメッセージ:

>> On Feb 20, 2017, at 10:51 PM, Robert Widmann
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.swift.org/pipermail/swift-evolution/attachments/20170221/140c4d9b/attachment.html>

More information about the swift-evolution mailing list