[swift-evolution] [Proposal][Discussion] Modular Swift
devteam.codafi at gmail.com
Tue Feb 21 01:14:02 CST 2017
Sounds distressingly anti-modular!
Really, these kinds of hypotheticals can be addressed when the need arises. For now it's a hypothetical fear about a hypothetical issue that isn't expressible and highly discouraged by this system - why produce an inverted dependency when you could simply rebalance the module by moving the declaration into a more appropriate scope? I can assure you, the proposal seeks compatibility with the existing access control modifiers, not to have to contort them to fit its own goals.
2017/02/21 2:07、Jonathan Hull <jhull at gbis.com> のメッセージ:
>> On Feb 20, 2017, at 10:51 PM, Robert Widmann
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the swift-evolution