[swift-evolution] [Pitch] Allow use associated type outside of its protocol
曹剑楠
frogcjn at 163.com
Sun Feb 19 17:53:49 CST 2017
Thanks! Waiting for the new version.
> 在 2017年2月20日,上午7:42,Xiaodi Wu <xiaodi.wu at gmail.com> 写道:
>
> That is a new feature in Swift 3.1.
>
>
> On Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 5:32 PM, 曹剑楠 <frogcjn at 163.com <mailto:frogcjn at 163.com>> wrote:
> Sorry about my typo:
>
> public struct Album {
> public let sectionedMediaItemInfos: [Sectioned<MediaItemInfo>]?}
>
>
> public struct Sectioned<Item> : SectionProtocol {
> public let title: String?
> public let items: [Item]
>
> public init() {
> items = []
> title = nil
> }
> }
>
> public extension Array where Element == Sectioned {
>
> var itemsCount: Int {
> return reduce(0) { (result, section) in result + section.items.count }
> }
>
> var items: [Element.Item] {
> return self.flatMap { $0.items }
> }
> }
>
> Allow extension Array with strict its Element with a struct type (may be generic) is highly wanted feature.
>
>> 在 2017年2月20日,上午7:28,曹剑楠 <frogcjn at 163.com <mailto:frogcjn at 163.com>> 写道:
>>
>>
>> OK, my fault. That solved the problem.
>>
>>> var items: [Element.SectionItemType]
>>
>> I should use this.
>>
>> How about to allow using generic type Section directly instead of declare a protocol
>>
>> ```Swift
>> public extension Array where Element == Section {
>>
>> var itemsCount: Int {
>> return reduce(0) { (result, section) in result + section.items.count }
>> }
>>
>> var items: [Element.SectionItemType] {
>> return self.flatMap { $0.items }
>> }
>> }
>> ```
>>
>>> 在 2017年2月20日,上午7:14,Xiaodi Wu <xiaodi.wu at gmail.com <mailto:xiaodi.wu at gmail.com>> 写道:
>>>
>>> On Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 5:04 PM, 曹剑楠 via swift-evolution <swift-evolution at swift.org <mailto:swift-evolution at swift.org>> wrote:
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> I’m coding for section like data structure.
>>> For example:
>>>
>>> I have an Album struct, which has many MediaItems.
>>> It has a sectioned property called "sectionedMediaItemInfos", which is an array of sections.
>>> Each section represents for a disc, and has an "items" array contains all MedaItems in that disc.
>>>
>>> The define code is like:
>>>
>>> ```Swift
>>> public struct Album {
>>> public let sectionedMediaItemInfos: [Sectioned<MediaItemInfo>]?
>>> }
>>>
>>> public struct Sectioned<Item> : SectionProtocol {
>>> public let title: String?
>>> public let items: [Item]
>>>
>>> public init() {
>>> items = []
>>> title = nil
>>> }
>>> }
>>>
>>> public protocol SectionProtocol {
>>> associatedtype SectionItemType
>>> var items: [SectionItemType] { get }
>>> }
>>> ```
>>>
>>> Now I want to define some extra properties for sections array, like
>>> "sectionMediaItemInfos"."itemsCount" that count all items in each sections.
>>> So I can write that extension:
>>>
>>> ```Swift
>>> public extension Array where Element : SectionProtocol {
>>>
>>> var itemsCount: Int {
>>> return reduce(0) { (result, section) in result + section.items.count }
>>> }
>>>
>>> }
>>> ```
>>>
>>> So I can get my itemsCount with code like:
>>>
>>> ```Swift
>>> album.sectionedMediaItemInfos.itemsCount
>>> ```
>>>
>>> That looks good.
>>>
>>> Then I want to define code to return all items in this sectioned property.
>>>
>>>
>>> ```Swift
>>> public extension Array where Element : SectionProtocol {
>>> var items: [SectionProtocol.SectionItemType] {
>>> return .flatMap { $0.items }
>>> }
>>> }
>>> ```
>>>
>>> Sorry, I'm reading this quickly, but I'm confused as to why you're not writing `var items: [Element.SectionItemType]`. That seems to be what you want, no? `SectionProtocol.SectionItemType` has no constraints and, even if the grammar allowed you to write it, would have to be equivalent to `Any`.
>>>
>>> This doesn’t work. It reported as "Cannot use associated type 'SectionItemType' outside of its protocol"
>>>
>>> The only way to achieve my goals is to untyped the extended "items" property:
>>>
>>> ```Swift
>>> public extension Array where Element : SectionProtocol {
>>> var items: [Any] {
>>> return self.flatMap { $0.items }
>>> }
>>> }
>>> ```
>>>
>>> Which is not perfect for this case.
>>>
>>>
>>> So in this special case, I think allow use associated type outside of its protocol is necessary.
>>>
>>> And we may allow define protocol with generic type. That would be more convenient.
>>>
>>>
>>> ```Swift
>>> public struct Album {
>>> public let sectionedMediaItemInfos: [Sectioned<MediaItemInfo>]?
>>> }
>>>
>>>
>>> public struct Sectioned<Item> : SectionProtocol {
>>> public let title: String?
>>> public let items: [Item]
>>>
>>> public init() {
>>> items = []
>>> title = nil
>>> }
>>> }
>>>
>>> public protocol SectionProtocol<SectionItemType> {
>>> var items: [SectionItemType] { get }
>>> }
>>>
>>>
>>> public extension Array where Element : SectionProtocol {
>>> var items: [Element.SectionItemType] {
>>> return self.flatMap { $0.items }
>>> }
>>> }
>>>
>>> ```
>>>
>>> Thank all!
>>>
>>> Jiannan
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> swift-evolution mailing list
>>> swift-evolution at swift.org <mailto:swift-evolution at swift.org>
>>> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution <https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.swift.org/pipermail/swift-evolution/attachments/20170220/63c47f37/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the swift-evolution
mailing list