[swift-evolution] Warning when omitting default case for imported enums
Rien
Rien at Balancingrock.nl
Tue Feb 7 12:49:59 CST 2017
If you don’t want the default case, and if you like a warning free compilation, you need a way to suppress the warning.
Regards,
Rien
Site: http://balancingrock.nl
Blog: http://swiftrien.blogspot.com
Github: http://github.com/Balancingrock
Project: http://swiftfire.nl
> On 07 Feb 2017, at 19:42, Tanner Nelson <tanner at qutheory.io> wrote:
>
> I don't understand the part about warning suppression. The warning would go away when you add the default case.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On Feb 7, 2017, at 16:25, Rien <Rien at Balancingrock.nl> wrote:
>>
>> -1
>>
>> Reason 1: the “negative” behaviour you describe is actually exactly what I want to happen.
>> Reason 2: Introducing a warning would also necessitate a warning suppression in order to have your code compile without warnings. But when you suppress, the purpose of the warning is nul and void.
>>
>> PS: I would suggest not to use an enum in cases where this is really annoying and replace the enums with constants.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Rien
>>
>> Site: http://balancingrock.nl
>> Blog: http://swiftrien.blogspot.com
>> Github: http://github.com/Balancingrock
>> Project: http://swiftfire.nl
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On 07 Feb 2017, at 16:12, Tanner Nelson via swift-evolution <swift-evolution at swift.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello Swift Evolution,
>>>
>>> I'd like to propose that a warning be emitted when default cases are omitted for enums from other modules.
>>>
>>> What this would look like:
>>>
>>> OtherModule:
>>> ```
>>> public enum SomeEnum {
>>> case one
>>> case two
>>> }
>>>
>>> public let global: SomeEnum = .one
>>> ```
>>>
>>> executable:
>>> ```
>>> import OtherModule
>>>
>>> switch OtherModule.global {
>>> case .one: break
>>> case .two: break
>>> ^~~~~ ⚠︎ Warning: Default case recommended for imported enums. Fix-it: Add `default: break`
>>> }
>>> ```
>>>
>>> Why:
>>>
>>> Allowing the omission of a default case in an exhaustive switch makes the addition of a new case to the enum a breaking change.
>>> In other words, if you're exhaustively switching on an enum from an imported library, the imported library can break your code by adding a new case to that enum (which the library authors may erroneously view as an additive/minor-bump change).
>>>
>>> Background:
>>>
>>> As a maintainer of a Swift framework, public enums have been a pain point in maintaining semver. They've made it difficult to implement additive features and have necessitated the avoidance of enums in our future public API plans.
>>>
>>> Related Twitter thread: https://twitter.com/tanner0101/status/796860273760104454
>>>
>>> Looking forward to hearing your thoughts.
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> Tanner
>>>
>>> Tanner Nelson
>>> Vapor
>>> +1 (435) 773-2831
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> swift-evolution mailing list
>>> swift-evolution at swift.org
>>> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
>>
More information about the swift-evolution
mailing list