[swift-evolution] protocol-oriented integers (take 2)

[Anton Mironov]

I wish I knew how to express those requirements in the type system.
This is a good way to implement additiveIdentity but I assume that Arithmetic protocol implies behavior of Addable.


> On Jan 25, 2017, at 20:58, David Sweeris <davesweeris at mac.com> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> On Jan 25, 2017, at 07:59, Anton Mironov via swift-evolution <swift-evolution at swift.org> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi everyone,
>> 
>> I want to suggest a tiny extension to an Arithmetic protocol. It would be nice to have an additive identity and a multiplicative identity constants. Basically zero and one.
>> 
>> ```
>> protocol Arithmetic {
>>  /* ... */
>>  static var zero: Self { get }  // additive identity: (value + .zero) == value
>>  static var one: Self { get }   // multiplicative identity: (value * .one) == value
>> }
>> ```
>> 
>> These constants will ease implementation of math structures: vectors, matrices and etc.
>> I’m sorry if I’m duplicating someone’s suggestion. It is really hard to search for something in a long thread.
> 
> Vectors, matrices, etc can't conform to this protocol anyway because of the * and / requirements. And while it is true that it's not uncommon to reference an all-zero matrix or vector as "0", that doesn't work for any other number... for them I think the spelling should be "additiveIdentity". It'll be easy enough to just say
> protocol Addable {
>    static var additiveIdentity: Self {get}
>    ...
> }
> extension Addable where Self: Arithmetic {
>    static var additiveIdentity: Self {return Self.zero}
> }
> 
> IMHO, anyway.
> 
> - Dave Sweeris

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.swift.org/pipermail/swift-evolution/attachments/20170125/56e2c555/attachment.html>