[swift-evolution] Any consideration for directoryprivate as a compliment to fileprivate?

[Daniel Leping]

-1 will just bring mess and unclearness.

It can work with Java-like approach where a package is a folder. Since we
have no strict decisions for that - please, don't do it.

On Thu, 8 Dec 2016 at 21:10 Gonçalo Alvarez Peixoto via swift-evolution <
swift-evolution at swift.org> wrote:

> @Jim
>
> You most certainly offended no one! Quite the opposite. This being an open
> source community, every contribution counts and, imho,  you did nothing but
> to *contribute *to swift's evolution!
>
> Thanks for backing typeprivate proposal. We have been looking for ways to
> restructure our proposal based on all the fine arguments raised by everyone
> during the discussion, however we have not found time to complete it. We
> will definitely keep in touch in the following days. I believe your
> proposal really relates to ours. The real urge is to revisit access level
> controls, if need it be, and create finer grained modifiers for better
> communication.
>
> @Derrick
>
> This being said, the solution might even reduce the number of access
> control modifiers and not just add one more to the pile. I think we all aim
> to have the right amount of modifiers for the right amount of use cases.
> Should they be organised and designed in a way that better conveys their
> intent, then I believe the number will not be the number one problem.
>
> @Tino
>
> I do agree with you. It is sometimes hard to keep track of all the
> proposals/discussions being raised. While I do believe this is an open
> enough forum for everyone to participate in, it can become quite hard to
> have the full spectrum of discussions in sight at first glance.
>
> Best,
> Gonçalo
>
> 2016-12-08 18:51 GMT+00:00 Tino Heth <2th at gmx.de>:
>
> Hi Jim,
>
>
>
>
>
> > This is my first use of this forum. I certainly did not mean to cause
> pain for anyone.
>
>
>
>
>
> I hope I didn't sound as if I was blaming you — imho it is not realistic
> to keep track of the evolution process as it is organised now, so even
> exact repetition is rather common
>
>
>
>
>
> > At Gonzalo's invitation I have looked over the thread for his proposal
> and I am withdrawing my request and backing his with a very heavy +1.
>
>
> This one?
> https://github.com/goncaloalvarez/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/NNNN-introduce-typeprivate-access-control-level.md
>
>
>
>
>
> > If I have offended anyone I ask their forgiveness. Since you mentioned
> it I will state that the Xcode approach to project groups is one that I
> have yet to understand the merit of.
>
>
> > Gonzalo: please let me know how I can assist you.
>
>
> I don't think anyone is offended, and imho your offer to Gonzalo is a good
> move (it's just sad that there is no established tool for such
> collaboration)
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> swift-evolution mailing list
>
> swift-evolution at swift.org
>
> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.swift.org/pipermail/swift-evolution/attachments/20161209/589ac966/attachment.html>