[swift-evolution] Three questions about a more "dynamic" Swift for InfoQ
rparada at mac.com
Tue Sep 27 11:29:30 CDT 2016
> On Sep 26, 2016, at 5:32 PM, Robert Widmann via swift-evolution <swift-evolution at swift.org> wrote:
> No, and I think moving towards a more dynamic Swift now without as-of-yet-seen significant justification would be a mistake. Swift should be as static as possible. We should be making every attempt to pare down the existing runtime and quietly transition those that rely on dynamism to checked reflection (yes, that is not in fact an oxymoron). The more the compiler knows about your program, the better it does. Period.
How would you implement something like Core Data in pure Swift on the server where the Obj-C runtime is not available?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the swift-evolution