[swift-evolution] Mark protocol methods with their protocol

[Vladimir.S]

On 22.09.2016 7:46, Russ Bishop via swift-evolution wrote:
>
>> On Sep 20, 2016, at 4:34 PM, Dave Abrahams via swift-evolution
>> <swift-evolution at swift.org> wrote:
>>
>>
>> on Tue Sep 20 2016, Karl <razielim-AT-gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I think the best way is to prefix the member name with the protocol,
>>> e.g:
>>>
>>> protocol MyProto { var aVariable : Int func aFunction() } class
>>> MyClass : MyProto { var MyProto.aVariable : Int func
>>> MyProto.aFunction() { … } }
>> ...
>>> CC-ing Dave A, to understand better if this fits with the vision of
>>> protocols
>>
>> I generally agree with Doug.  The canonical way to indicate “this
>> method/property/type implements a requirement of protocol P” should
>> be to define the entity in an extension that also adds conformance to
>> P. If that's inadequate indication in some way we should find a way
>> to enhance it.  I wouldn't mind the notation above, but only as a
>> fallback, not a reuquirement.
>>
>> -- -Dave _______________________________________________
>
> Indeed this is exactly how C# handles Interfaces (protocols). The


Can C#'s interface(protocol) have default implementations for its 
requirements like in Swift?


> default is the exact same way Swift works - by matching names. If there
> is a collision you specify Protocol.memberName. Its simple and in the
> years I was writing C# code it was flexible enough to cover most
> reasonable scenarios, without adding a bunch of boilerplate.
>
> Russ
>
> _______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing
> list swift-evolution at swift.org
> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
>