[swift-evolution] [Draft] Fix a typo in two String methods

[Charlie Monroe]

> ES++

    ^-- error: '++' is unavailable: it has been removed in Swift 3

:)

>  for exactly the same reasons. I use postfix increment because I didn’t even think of the completion angle until Mark brought it up. The fingers type what the fingers type.
> 
> I also support for the other many fine reasons previously mentioned in this thread: matches user expectations, the description is more commonly used in art than NUL, which remains obscure even if technically accurate. See also: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Null-terminated_string <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Null-terminated_string>. I want to contribute to the “broad community support for renaming”.
> 
> That said, I’d prefer utf8String and utf8CString, but I suspect that’s a non-starter, and the initial pitch misidentifies the properties as methods.
> 
> — E
> 
> 
>> On Jul 24, 2016, at 11:39 AM, Mark Dalrymple via swift-evolution <swift-evolution at swift.org <mailto:swift-evolution at swift.org>> wrote:
>> 
>> +1, mainly because if someone uses on-demand completion (like me) thinking it's called "nullTerminated", typing "null" will not complete if the method name is "nulTerminated"
>> 
>> ++md
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> swift-evolution mailing list
> swift-evolution at swift.org
> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.swift.org/pipermail/swift-evolution/attachments/20160725/2fde682d/attachment.html>