[swift-evolution] [Revision] [Pitch] Rename `T.Type`

Jose Cheyo Jimenez cheyo at masters3d.com
Sat Jul 23 15:45:41 CDT 2016

I'm finding it really hard to see the advantage of this proposal with out reconciling the possibility of .self going away. I think this should be postponed after .self is reviewed in swift 4. Premature optimization imo. 

> On Jul 22, 2016, at 3:20 PM, David Hart via swift-evolution <swift-evolution at swift.org> wrote:
> Where do these double generics come from? Never saw them...
>> On 22 Jul 2016, at 17:54, Anton Zhilin <antonyzhilin at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 2016-07-22 18:51 GMT+03:00 David Hart <david at hartbit.com>:
>>> Isn't the solution to a lot of these issues allowing explicit generalization instead of this meta type business?
>> And what would you suggest for "double generics" in initializers?
>> ExampleType<Int><Double>()  // not good
> _______________________________________________
> swift-evolution mailing list
> swift-evolution at swift.org
> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.swift.org/pipermail/swift-evolution/attachments/20160723/a8707690/attachment.html>

More information about the swift-evolution mailing list