[swift-evolution] [swift-evolution-announce] [Review #2] SE-0117: Default classes to be non-subclassable publicly

[Jose Cheyo Jimenez]

> On Jul 20, 2016, at 11:44 AM, Tino Heth via swift-evolution <swift-evolution at swift.org> wrote:
> 
> 
>> Am 20.07.2016 um 18:20 schrieb L. Mihalkovic <laurent.mihalkovic at gmail.com <mailto:laurent.mihalkovic at gmail.com>>:
>> 
>>> So my advice: Be glad that you don't see such problems in your real work life, and hope that the extremists who would like to completely remove classic object orientation and cripple Swift to fully match their ideals don't prevail ;-)
>> 
>> That ship has sailed... it is now just a matter of the implementation details... My hopes are now on google forking swift like they did to webkit and dalvik. It won't save the apps, bug it would the servers.
> ;-) nay, that's a little bit to pessimistic for me:
> After all, even with SE-0117, you can still write nice code with Swift — it just will be less fun :(
> 
> Afaics, there is constant pressure to turn Swift into a language for fools,
“
 Because the people who are crazy enough to think they can change the world, are the ones who do.

"

> rather than a language that helps us avoiding foolish mistakes… but so far, Swift got more things right for me than any of the alternatives.
> _______________________________________________
> swift-evolution mailing list
> swift-evolution at swift.org
> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.swift.org/pipermail/swift-evolution/attachments/20160720/4242cd9c/attachment.html>