[swift-evolution] [swift-evolution-announce] [Review #2] SE-0117: Default classes to be non-subclassable publicly

Leonardo Pessoa me at lmpessoa.com
Mon Jul 18 16:38:40 CDT 2016

I believe this is not in discussion anymore. We're just debating some
specifics now.


On 18 July 2016 at 18:33, John Randolph via swift-evolution
<swift-evolution at swift.org> wrote:
> - infinity for this proposal.
> If adopted, it will mean that whenever I want to extend a class implemented by a short-sighted developer, I’ll have to resort to wrappers and classes that own instances of the lobotomized class, etc, etc.
> java.lang.string is final.   I will never forgive Gosling for that.
> -jcr
> _______________________________________________
> swift-evolution mailing list
> swift-evolution at swift.org
> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution

More information about the swift-evolution mailing list