[swift-evolution] [Pitch] Introduce continue to switch statements

[Douglas Gregor]

> On Jul 12, 2016, at 9:20 AM, Taras Zakharko <taras.zakharko at uzh.ch> wrote:
> 
> I’d love to see goto in Swift, but on the other hand, do {} with labels have so far been sufficient for any practical problem I encountered so far. Goto is much more useful in languages like C, which lack nested functions and other abstraction mechanisms. 
> 
> Of course, I wouldn’t try to write a high-performance interpreter in Swift any time soon. 

*Sigh*.

Erica was making a joke. There shall be no ‘goto’ in Swift.

	- Doug

> 
> — T
> 
>> On 12 Jul 2016, at 18:07, Leonardo Pessoa via swift-evolution <swift-evolution at swift.org> wrote:
>> 
>> I'd agree with Doug, completely out of scope. The only way I'd support
>> a goto statement was to jump to another switch case as in C#.
>> 
>> L
>> 
>> 
>> On 12 July 2016 at 12:49, Douglas Gregor via swift-evolution
>> <swift-evolution at swift.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> On Jul 12, 2016, at 8:47 AM, Erica Sadun via swift-evolution
>>> <swift-evolution at swift.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Jul 11, 2016, at 4:49 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> As for all of the other additive changes, I would strongly prefer you to
>>> *wait* on even proposing or discussing these things until after the Swift
>>> 3.0 evolution cycle is done.  Not only is it distracting for the community,
>>> but the core team and many others won’t be be able to even read the thread
>>> or the responses, thus your discussion cycle will be lacking key input.
>>> 
>>> On this topic, we specifically discussed this when labeled breaks were being
>>> designed, and when they were expanded to “do” in Swift 2.  We specifically
>>> decided to allow break but not continue, because we didn’t want these
>>> control flow statements to be “another way to spell a loop”.
>>> 
>>> -Chris
>>> 
>>> 
>>> So I can take it as a given that this is out of scope for Swift 3 too?
>>> 
>>> https://gist.github.com/erica/a78045d09fa5bb20e6e566295140c84d
>>> 
>>> 
>>> No, *that* is out of scope for *Swift*.
>>> 
>>> - Doug
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> swift-evolution mailing list
>>> swift-evolution at swift.org
>>> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
>>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> swift-evolution mailing list
>> swift-evolution at swift.org
>> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
>