[swift-evolution] [Review] SE-0118: Closure Parameter Names and Labels

Taras Zakharko taras.zakharko at uzh.ch
Fri Jul 8 01:13:23 CDT 2016


> 	* What is your evaluation of the proposal?

In general +1, except maybe the change of to isOrderedBefore: by: in sort-related functions. I fear that the new label makes it less clear that the ordering relation is that of strict precedence. It can be particularly confusing for people used to other APIs.

> 	* Is the problem being addressed significant enough to warrant a change to Swift?

Well, in the end its an arbitrary decision. Either one works on practice. Personally, I don’t see the issue as being very significant. 

> 	* Does this proposal fit well with the feel and direction of Swift?

Yes, it follows the spirit of the naming guidelines

> 	* If you have used other languages or libraries with a similar feature, how do you feel that this proposal compares to those?
> 	* How much effort did you put into your review? A glance, a quick reading, or an in-depth study?


A glance


> On 06 Jul 2016, at 01:10, Chris Lattner via swift-evolution <swift-evolution at swift.org> wrote:
> 
> Hello Swift community,
> 
> The review of "SE-0118: Closure Parameter Names and Labels" begins now and runs through July 11. The proposal is available here:
> 
> 	https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/0118-closure-parameter-names-and-labels.md
> 
> Reviews are an important part of the Swift evolution process. All reviews should be sent to the swift-evolution mailing list at
> 
> 	https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
> 
> or, if you would like to keep your feedback private, directly to the review manager.
> 
> What goes into a review?
> 
> The goal of the review process is to improve the proposal under review through constructive criticism and contribute to the direction of Swift. When writing your review, here are some questions you might want to answer in your review:
> 
> 	* What is your evaluation of the proposal?
> 	* Is the problem being addressed significant enough to warrant a change to Swift?
> 	* Does this proposal fit well with the feel and direction of Swift?
> 	* If you have used other languages or libraries with a similar feature, how do you feel that this proposal compares to those?
> 	* How much effort did you put into your review? A glance, a quick reading, or an in-depth study?
> 
> More information about the Swift evolution process is available at
> 
> 	https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/process.md
> 
> Thank you,
> 
> -Chris Lattner
> Review Manager
> 
> _______________________________________________
> swift-evolution mailing list
> swift-evolution at swift.org
> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.swift.org/pipermail/swift-evolution/attachments/20160708/bb067164/attachment.html>


More information about the swift-evolution mailing list