[swift-evolution] [swift-evolution-announce] [Review #2] SE-0091: Improving operator requirements in protocols
danielzresnick at gmail.com
Thu Jul 7 13:36:55 CDT 2016
> What is your evaluation of the proposal?
> Is the problem being addressed significant enough to warrant a change to
Yes, the current situation of defining a protocol required operator
function globally is potentially confusing and feels inconsistent.
> Does this proposal fit well with the feel and direction of Swift?
How much effort did you put into your review? A glance, a quick reading, or
> an in-depth study?
One thing that's not completely clear to me: if you implement the operator
function as a class method and override it in a subclass, in what situation
would the overridden version be called?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the swift-evolution