[swift-evolution] [swift-evolution-announce] [Review #2] SE-0091: Improving operator requirements in protocols

Daniel Resnick danielzresnick at gmail.com
Thu Jul 7 13:36:55 CDT 2016

> What is your evaluation of the proposal?

> Is the problem being addressed significant enough to warrant a change to
> Swift?
Yes, the current situation of defining a protocol required operator
function globally is potentially confusing and feels inconsistent.

> Does this proposal fit well with the feel and direction of Swift?

How much effort did you put into your review? A glance, a quick reading, or
> an in-depth study?

A reading.

One thing that's not completely clear to me: if you implement the operator
function as a class method and override it in a subclass, in what situation
would the overridden version be called?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.swift.org/pipermail/swift-evolution/attachments/20160707/373703fa/attachment.html>

More information about the swift-evolution mailing list