[swift-evolution] [Discussion] A Problem With SE-0025?

[David Hart]

> On 29 Jun 2016, at 04:03, Matthew Judge <matthew.judge at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> If I understand SE-0025 (even with the amendment) you can still spell the access modifier to types as 'private' and get the same characteristics as the pre-SE-0025 meaning or private, so I'm not sure I understand the concern here. However (continued below)

The characteristic I will be missing is for the following style of writing:

class MyViewController : UIViewController {
    private var privateInfo: String?
}

//MARK: Public

public extension MyViewController {
    func publicFunction() {
        // CAN’T ACCESS privateInfo
    }
}

//MARK: UITableViewDataSource

private extension MyViewController : UITableViewDataSource {
    func numberOfRowsInSection(_ section: Int) -> Int
        // CAN’T ACCESS privateInfo
    }
}

//MARK: Private

private extension MyViewController {
    func implementationFunction() {
        // CAN’T ACCESS privateInfo
    }
}
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.swift.org/pipermail/swift-evolution/attachments/20160629/599db5a1/attachment.html>