[swift-evolution] [Proposal draft] NSError bridging

[Riley Testut]

Love the proposal overall, but not sure about the CustomNSError name either. It doesn’t seem to read like a Swift protocol name.
 
Somewhat related, is there a reason these protocols don’t contain the “Protocol” suffix? Stands in stark contrast with the rest of the Swift protocol naming conventions (AFAIK).

> On Jun 28, 2016, at 4:33 PM, Douglas Gregor via swift-evolution <swift-evolution at swift.org> wrote:
> 
> 
>> On Jun 27, 2016, at 1:58 PM, Charles Srstka via swift-evolution <swift-evolution at swift.org> wrote:
>> 
>> Obviously, I’m in favor of this one. +1!
>> 
>> I think I did prefer the older name of CustomUserInfoError for the domain/code/userInfo protocol, rather than CustomNSError. This is just because I’d like to be able to do a global search through my project for “NSError” and have it turn up empty. Maybe a silly reason, I know. ;-)
> 
> 
> I’m floating CustomNSError as the protocol name because I don’t feel that domain, core, or userInfo are fundamental to the Swift error model—they’re about exposing things specifically to NSError.
> 
> 	- Doug
> 
> _______________________________________________
> swift-evolution mailing list
> swift-evolution at swift.org
> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution