[swift-evolution] [Proposal Draft] Literal Syntax Protocols

Sun Jun 26 12:06:04 CDT 2016

what about `*LiteralRepresentable`?

On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 11:11 AM, Hooman Mehr via swift-evolution <
swift-evolution at swift.org> wrote:

> Syntax by itself is not clear enough. Appending Initializable makes it too
> long.
>
> We can replace Syntax with LiteralSyntax to clarify. Then we will have:
>
> extension MyNumber: LiteralSyntax.Integer, LiteralSyntax.Float { /*…*/ }
>
> Better yet, to address the valid concern of doing something so different
> and hack-like for literals, how about simply *renaming
> *LiteralConvertible protocols to *LiteralSyntax or LiteralSyntax*.* The
> key is the *LiteralSyntax* phrase which (I think) is the clearest short
> phrase we can get to communicate the intent. Look: It is right there in the
> title!
>
> On Jun 23, 2016, at 8:31 AM, Matthew Johnson via swift-evolution <
> swift-evolution at swift.org> wrote:
>
> I have completed a draft of a proposal to move the `*LiteralConvertible`
> protocols into a `Syntax` namespace as suggested by the standard library
> team.
>
> The draft can be found here:
> https://gist.github.com/anandabits/99dad2305d310874bd613b72b14eee56.  It
> is also included below.
>
> I will submit a PR in the next day or two after incorporating any feedback.
>
> -Matthew
>
> Literal Syntax Protocols
>
>    - Proposal: SE-NNNN
>    - Author: Matthew Johnson <https://github.com/anandabits>
>    - Status: *Awaiting review*
>    - Review manager: TBD
>
> Introduction
>
> This proposal renames the *LiteralConvertible protocols to Syntax.*Literal
> .
>
> Swift-evolution thread: Revisiting SE–0041 Names
> <http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.swift.evolution/21290>
> Motivation
>
> The standard library currently has protocols that use the term Convertible in
> two different ways. The *LiteralConvertible protocols use the meaning of
> converting *from* a literal. The Custom(Debug)StringConvertible protocols
> use the meaning of converting *to* a String. This causes confusion for
> developers attempting to name their own protocols following the precedence
> established by the standard library.
>
> Further, the standard library team has observed:
>
> The "literal" protocols are not about conversion, they are about adopting a certain syntax provided by the language.  "Convertible" in the name is a red herring: a type can't be convertible from an integer literal because there is no "IntegerLiteral" entity in the type system.  The literal *becomes* typed as the corresponding literal type (e.g., Int or String), and as far as the user at the call site is concerned, there is no visible conversion (even if one is happening behind the scenes)
>
> An earlier proposal
> <https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/0041-conversion-protocol-conventions.md> was
> intended to address the first problem by introducing strong naming
> conventions for three kinds of conversion protocols (*from*, *to*, and
> *bidirectional*). The review highlighted the difficulity in establishing
> conventions that everyone is happy with. This proposal takes a different
> approach to solving the problem that originally inspired that proposal
> while also solving the awkwardness of the current names described by the
> standard library team.
> Proposed solution
>
> This proposal addresses both problems by introducing a Syntax “namespace”
> and moving the *LiteralConvertible protocols into that “namespace” while
> also renaming them. The proposal *does not* make any changes to the
> requirements of the protocols.
> Detailed design
>
> All of the *LiteralConvertible protocols will receive new *Literal names
> inside a Syntaxnamespace.
>
> This namespace will initially be implemented using a case-less enum, but
> this detail may change in the future if submodules or namespaces are added
> to Swift. Swift does not currently allow protocols to be declared inside
> the scope of a type. In order to work around this limitation the protocols
> themselves will be declared using underscore-prefixed names internal to the
> standard library. Typealiases inside the Syntax enum will declare the
> names intended to be visible to user code.
>
> This proposal does not change any requirements of these protocols. All
> requirements of all *LiteralConvertible protocols will remain exactly the
> same.
>
> The following protocol declarations and names:
>
> public protocol NilLiteralConvertible { ... }public protocol BooleanLiteralConvertible { ... }public protocol FloatLiteralConvertible { ... }public protocol IntegerLiteralConvertible { ... }public protocol UnicodeScalarLiteralConvertible { ... }public protocol ExtendedGraphemeClusterConvertible { ... }public protocol StringLiteralLiteralConvertible { ... }public protocol StringInterpolationLiteralConvertible { ... }public protocol ArrayLiteralConvertible { ... }public protocol DictionaryLiteralConvertible { ... }
>
> Are changed as follows:
>
> public protocol _NilLiteralSyntax { ... }public protocol _BooleanLiteralSyntax { ... }public protocol _IntegerLiteralSyntax { ... }public protocol _FloatLiteralSyntax { ... }public protocol _UnicodeScalarLiteralSyntax { ... }public protocol _ExtendedGraphemeClusterLiteralSyntax { ... }public protocol _StringLiteralLiteralSyntax { ... }public protocol _StringInterpolationLiteralSyntax { ... }public protocol _ArrayLiteralSyntax { ... }public protocol _DictionaryLiteralSyntax { ... }
> public /* closed */ enum Syntax {
>   public typealias NilLiteral = _NilLiteralSyntax
>   public typealias BooleanLiteral = _BooleanLiteralSyntax
>   public typealias IntegerLiteral = _IntegerLiteralSyntax
>   public typealias FloatLiteral = _FloatLiteralSyntax
>   public typealias UnicodeScalarLiteral = _UnicodeScalarLiteralSyntax
>   public typealias ExtendedGraphemeClusterLiteral = _ExtendedGraphemeClusterLiteralSyntax
>   public typealias StringLiteralLiteral = _StringLiteralLiteralSyntax
>   public typealias StringInterplolationLiteral = _StringInterpolationLiteralSyntax
>   public typealias ArrayrLiteral = _ArrayLiteralSyntax
>   public typealias DictionaryLiteral = _DictionaryLiteralSyntax
> }
>
> Impact on existing code
>
> All code that references any of the *LiteralConvertible protocols will
> need to be modified to reference the protocol via the new Syntax.*Literal
>  name.
> Alternatives consideredProtocol names
>
> Several commenters have suggested that the names in this proposal are
> confusing at the site of use:
>
> struct Foo: Syntax.IntegerLiteral { ... }
>
> One alternative naming scheme would emphasize the semantic of initializing
> the type with a literal:
>
> struct Foo: Syntax.IntegerLiteralInitializable { ... }
>
> Discussion of the pros and cons of the proposed and alternative naming
> schemes is encouraged. The core team should feel free to make a final
> decision on the exact naming scheme used if they choose to accept this
> proposal.
> Previous proposal
>
> This proposal is a follow up to Updating Protocol Naming Conventions for
> Conversions
> <https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/0041-conversion-protocol-conventions.md>.
> Many related alternatives were explored during the discussion and review of
> that proposal.
> Acknowledgements
>
> The design described in this proposal was suggested by Dave Abrahams,
> Dmitri Gribenko, and Maxim Moiseev.
> _______________________________________________
> swift-evolution mailing list
> swift-evolution at swift.org
> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> swift-evolution mailing list
> swift-evolution at swift.org
> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.swift.org/pipermail/swift-evolution/attachments/20160626/e2d73be0/attachment.html>