[swift-evolution] [Draft] Change @noreturn to unconstructible return type
Michael Peternell
michael.peternell at gmx.at
Sun Jun 5 17:41:24 CDT 2016
> Am 05.06.2016 um 20:26 schrieb Антон Жилин via swift-evolution <swift-evolution at swift.org>:
>
> The following names were suggested: NoReturn, Bottom, None, Never.
> I would pick None, because it looks like opposite to Any and fits nicely in generic types.
I would like to call the type `Void`. `Void` is a type with zero possible values. The current `Void` would have to be renamed to `Unit`, the data type with exactly one possible value. Less C, More Haskell :) But wait, that's not really Haskell-ish, and it's not C-ish either.
From a typing perspective, it's nice to have a noreturn-function be able to return any type. For example, the Haskell `error` function has type `String -> a`, so you can write
fib :: Integer -> Integer
fib x = error "fib not yet implemented. Sorry"
and it will crash at runtime. Does this make sense for Swift? I don't think so. Swift is not a functional programming language, so I think that @noreturn shouldn't be force-fitted to look like a type. Given that most developers don't really think functionally, but rather imperatively, I don't think it's nice to force them to think functionally if they want to understand why @noreturn has been turned into `None`.
>
> I would prefer the type to be simple, and be implemented as a case-less enum (not a bottom value, as in Haskell).
That's a problem. Because `None`, `Never` or `NoReturn` will be a bottom value in Swift. "Bottom or not" is not a matter of "implementation", it's a conceptual issue. A function returns 'bottom' if and only if it does not return at all: that's the definition of 'bottom'.
func foo() -> NoReturn {
let x = fatalError("crash please")
print("1+1=2")
return x
}
The foo-function above will print "crash please" and crash, "1+1=2" will not be printed, because `fatalError` is a bottom-value. a @noreturn-function by definition returns a bottom value, and bottom shouldn't look like a normal type, and IMHO it shouldn't even have a name. So `@noreturn` looks fine to me.
-Michael
More information about the swift-evolution
mailing list