[swift-evolution] Proposal: 'T(literal)' should construct T using the appropriate literal protocol if possible

[Austin Zheng]

I would be very interested in seeing your original proposal presented
for formal review.

Austin

On 6/3/16, John McCall via swift-evolution <swift-evolution at swift.org> wrote:
>> On Jun 3, 2016, at 4:07 PM, David Sweeris <davesweeris at mac.com> wrote:
>>> On Jun 3, 2016, at 16:17, Matthew Johnson via swift-evolution
>>> <swift-evolution at swift.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> Using an external parameter label in a declaration and allowing it to be
>>> omitted at the call site does not feel like the right answer to me.  I
>>> think we can find a better way to present this syntactically.
>>
>> +eleventy gajillion
>
> I'm actually quite happy with the user-facing aspects of the current literal
> protocols and see zero reason to update them for this, so if that's the
> choice, I'll just leave this aside.
>
> John.
> _______________________________________________
> swift-evolution mailing list
> swift-evolution at swift.org
> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
>