[swift-evolution] [Pitch] Make `return` optional in computed properties for a single case
Matthew Johnson
matthew at anandabits.com
Tue May 31 14:02:37 CDT 2016
> On May 31, 2016, at 1:59 PM, Adrian Zubarev via swift-evolution <swift-evolution at swift.org> wrote:
>
>> +1. This is example *is not* a single expression code block. There are 3 expressions (the condition, the return value in the else block, and the primary return value).
>
> The `else` block is a returning single expression block. I can’t show the `guard` example without any returning scope.
>
> You said it yourself "everywhere in the language“. It’s not “everywhere“ if we would left out `guards` else-returning block.
I was speaking casually and meant “top level code blocks that return a value”. You are right that I wasn’t totally clear about that. I replied to your initial post with the clarification I believe is necessary.
> If we’d allow this we could also write:
>
> func test(boolean: Bool) {
> guard boolean else {}
> print("true")
> }
>
> This is useless and less readable.
>
> But we already can do this with closures:
>
> let nop = {} // useless
>
> switch value {
> ...
> default: {}() // do nothing
> }
>
> --
> Adrian Zubarev
> Sent with Airmail
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> swift-evolution mailing list
> swift-evolution at swift.org <mailto:swift-evolution at swift.org>
> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution <https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.swift.org/pipermail/swift-evolution/attachments/20160531/16eb055f/attachment.html>
More information about the swift-evolution
mailing list