[swift-evolution] [Review] SE-0077: Improved operator declarations

Антон Жилин antonyzhilin at gmail.com
Mon May 30 17:07:01 CDT 2016

I assume that Core team is scheduling a discussion or already discussing
the proposal, and that really takes time in our case.

In reply to Brent, I think that we can start requiring `public` if (when?)
operator visibility levels are added.

- Anton

2016-05-24 13:53 GMT+03:00 Brent Royal-Gordon <brent at architechies.com>:

> > > Can you qualify them with module names?
> > Right now, I guess, no, although that would be nice to have. I agree
> that this can be discussed later.
> I wonder if we should force people today to put a `public` keyword on
> their `operator` and `precedence` (or whatever) declarations, so that when
> we eventually *do* stop doing the weird global thing we're currently doing,
> existing code won't break (as much).
> --
> Brent Royal-Gordon
> Architechies
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.swift.org/pipermail/swift-evolution/attachments/20160531/ad8fa610/attachment.html>

More information about the swift-evolution mailing list