[swift-evolution] [swift-evolution-announce] [Review] SE-0099: Restructuring Condition Clauses

Patrick Smith pgwsmith at gmail.com
Sun May 29 00:16:09 CDT 2016

New proposal looks great. I love how this brings more consistency with how normal statements are written.

It would be nice to see in the proposal examples of before & afters for `while` too. Especially as it says "where clauses are no longer used to conjoin Boolean expressions with conditional binding. This fixes user confusion issues and addresses a problem where Boolean conditions need to be attached to arbitrary bindings.” An example of this?

> On 29 May 2016, at 8:48 AM, Chris Lattner via swift-evolution <swift-evolution at swift.org> wrote:
>> On May 27, 2016, at 12:11 PM, Joe Groff <jgroff at apple.com <mailto:jgroff at apple.com>> wrote:
>> Hello Swift community,
>> The review of SE-0099 “Restructuring Condition Clauses” begins now and runs through June 3, 2016. The proposal is available here:
>> 	https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/0099-conditionclauses.md <https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/0099-conditionclauses.md>
> Thanks everyone.  FYI, Erica and I discussed it offlist and agreed to amend the proposal: now you can use semicolons or a newline to separate clauses of different types.
> -Chris
> _______________________________________________
> swift-evolution mailing list
> swift-evolution at swift.org
> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.swift.org/pipermail/swift-evolution/attachments/20160529/8773bcbb/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the swift-evolution mailing list