[swift-evolution] Proposal SE-0009 Reconsideration
possen at gmail.com
Thu May 26 16:40:35 CDT 2016
While not as nice, Vladimir’s colon suggestion could work. :g()
Reminds a bit of C++ but not bad.
> On May 26, 2016, at 2:05 PM, Brent Royal-Gordon <brent at architechies.com> wrote:
>> * Already very similar notation for enums where you leave off the entity name when it can be implied.
> That's the problem. Leading dot already means something—it means "look up a static member of the type we're expecting here". (That's what you're actually doing when you access an "enum case".) It can't mean two different things in the same place.
> Brent Royal-Gordon
More information about the swift-evolution