[swift-evolution] [swift-evolution-announce] [Review] SE-0096: Converting dynamicType from a property to an operator
Sebastian Hagedorn
sebastian at iosphere.de
Wed May 25 03:39:24 CDT 2016
> * What is your evaluation of the proposal?
+1
> * Is the problem being addressed significant enough to warrant a change to Swift?
Probably, although I don’t think it’s an essential change.
I do believe strongly that “dynamicType” is better than “typeof", for the reason explained in the proposal: It is unclear whether it’s the static or dynamic type.
> * Does this proposal fit well with the feel and direction of Swift?
Yes
> * If you have used other languages or libraries with a similar feature, how do you feel that this proposal compares to those?
ObjC, but I don’t think it compares well
> * How much effort did you put into your review? A glance, a quick reading, or an in-depth study?
Read the proposal and some of the previous discussion.
More information about the swift-evolution
mailing list