[swift-evolution] [Review] SE-0091: Improving operator requirements in protocols
David Sweeris
davesweeris at mac.com
Mon May 23 23:20:21 CDT 2016
> On May 18, 2016, at 18:07, plx via swift-evolution <swift-evolution at swift.org> wrote:
>
> How hard would it be to e.g. simply allow something like this:
>
> func ==<T:Equatable>(lhs: T, rhs: T) -> Bool {
> return lhs T.== rhs
> }
>
> …instead of the `T.==(lhs,rhs)` syntax?
Yeah, I've been meaning to suggest that. And 'T.++(x)' and '(x)T.++' for prefix and postfix, respectfully.
- Dave Sweeris
More information about the swift-evolution
mailing list