[swift-evolution] [Proposal] Add property for negation to Bool

[Charlie Monroe]

If you have a pipeline like this, I'd suggest to break it up into smaller segments also for the sake of readability...

The `not` var just doesn't seem right to me. Perhaps negatedValue? negatedBoolValue, since BooleanType has boolValue?

Question is whether this should be implemented on BooleanType or directly on Bool.

But I still have mixed feelings about this.

Charlie

> On May 21, 2016, at 5:42 PM, Антон Миронов <antonvmironov at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Good point. In such a case it would be more rational to have “not" as func not(value Bool) -> Bool { … } . But I am not a fun of such solution either.
> You see, in swift, there is a lot of code that looks like:
> 
> let newValue = rawValue
> 	.transformA(arg1) { ... }
> 	.transformB(arg2) { ... }
> 	.transformC(arg3) { ... }
> 
> It looks as a pipeline of transformations to me and I consider negation as one of those transformations. On the other hand negation operator totally breaks this pipeline. I personally prefer a bit longer list of transformations rather than list of transformations and negation operator as prefix to the list.
> 
>> 21 трав. 2016 р. о 17:59 Charlie Monroe <charlie at charliemonroe.net <mailto:charlie at charliemonroe.net>> написав(ла):
>> 
>> This would make sense as an operator (or actually it would have to be a keywod):
>> 
>> return not self.lanes[...].contains(.Gap)
>> 
>> Or if you don't mind having { } around the expression it could be defined as a function:
>> 
>> func not(@noescape block: (Void) -> Bool) rethrows -> Bool { return !block() }
>> 
>> Then you can have
>> 
>> return not { self.lanes[...].contains(.Gap) }
>> 
>> But I am personally not a fan of this.
>> 
>> Charlie
>> 
>>> On May 21, 2016, at 4:50 PM, Антон Миронов via swift-evolution <swift-evolution at swift.org <mailto:swift-evolution at swift.org>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> I found negation operator (!) the least detectable among the code. So I’ve decided to add property “not” to BooleanType (Swift 2.2) or Boolean on 3.0 with extension:
>>> 
>>> extension BooleanType {
>>> 	var not: Bool { return !self.boolValue }
>>> }
>>> 
>>> This is code with negation operator:
>>> 	return !self.lanes[position.y][currentLaneRange].contains(.Gap)
>>> 
>>> As I sad before negation operation is hard to spot. Moreover at first it looks like I’m trying to negate self for some reason.
>>> 
>>> This is code with “not” property:
>>> 	return self.lanes[position.y][currentLaneRange].contains(.Gap).not
>>> 
>>> Now it is easy to spot the statement I am actually getting negation of.
>>> On my experience negation operator can occasionally be missed while reading code. This happens less often with “not” property. So I’m proposing to add this property to standard library and prefer it in most cases.
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Anton Mironov
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> swift-evolution mailing list
>>> swift-evolution at swift.org <mailto:swift-evolution at swift.org>
>>> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution <https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution>
>> 
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.swift.org/pipermail/swift-evolution/attachments/20160521/46090b35/attachment.html>