[swift-evolution] [Review] SE-0089: Renaming String.init<T>(_: T)

Jacob Bandes-Storch jtbandes at gmail.com
Thu May 19 18:37:15 CDT 2016


Hm. That might conflict with:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.swift.evolution/17575

On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 4:02 PM, Austin Zheng via swift-evolution <
swift-evolution at swift.org> wrote:

> Excellent. Having one canonical, unambiguous way to get the string
> representation should make things simpler and easier for developers.
>
> Austin
>
> On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 3:57 PM, Dave Abrahams via swift-evolution <
> swift-evolution at swift.org> wrote:
>
>>
>> on Tue May 17 2016, Chris Lattner <swift-evolution at swift.org> wrote:
>>
>> > Hello Swift community,
>> >
>> > The review of "SE-0089: Renaming String.init<T>(_: T)" begins now and
>> > runs through May 23. The proposal is available here:
>> >
>> >
>> https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/0089-rename-string-reflection-init.md
>> >
>> > Reviews are an important part of the Swift evolution process. All
>> > reviews should be sent to the swift-evolution mailing list at
>> >
>> >       https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
>> >
>> > or, if you would like to keep your feedback private, directly to the
>> review manager.
>> >
>> > What goes into a review?
>> >
>> > The goal of the review process is to improve the proposal under review
>> > through constructive criticism and contribute to the direction of
>> > Swift. When writing your review, here are some questions you might
>> > want to answer in your review:
>> >
>> >       * What is your evaluation of the proposal?
>> >       * Is the problem being addressed significant enough to warrant a
>> change to Swift?
>> >       * Does this proposal fit well with the feel and direction of
>> Swift?
>> >       * If you have used other languages or libraries with a similar
>> > feature, how do you feel that this proposal compares to those?
>> >       * How much effort did you put into your review? A glance, a quick
>> reading, or an in-depth study?
>> >
>> > More information about the Swift evolution process is available at
>> >
>> >       https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/process.md
>>
>> I'm posting this on behalf of Dmitri Gribenko, and Max Moiseev, and
>> myself.
>>
>> We would like to accept the proposal with one modification: rather than
>> add an argument label, we'd like to drop the String initializer
>> altogether, making `"\(expression)"` the standard way to get a string
>> representation of `expression`.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> --
>> -Dave
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> swift-evolution mailing list
>> swift-evolution at swift.org
>> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> swift-evolution mailing list
> swift-evolution at swift.org
> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.swift.org/pipermail/swift-evolution/attachments/20160519/3c4a86ac/attachment.html>


More information about the swift-evolution mailing list