[swift-evolution] Proposal SE-0009 Reconsideration
Michael Peternell
michael.peternell at gmx.at
Thu May 19 12:14:29 CDT 2016
Hi Vladimir.S,
Goffredo already described it well. That was exactly what I was referring to.
-Michael
> Am 19.05.2016 um 14:51 schrieb Goffredo Marocchi <panajev at gmail.com>:
>
> In addition to what has already been posted:
>
> https://nomothetis.svbtle.com/the-ghost-of-swift-bugs-future
>
> https://medium.com/ios-os-x-development/swift-protocol-extension-method-dispatch-6a6bf270ba94#.14j0qq1i3
>
> (even more complete summary of previous research in this issue)
> http://allblue.me/swift/2016/01/23/swift-method-dispatch-with-protocol-extension-protocol-extension-and-subclass/
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On 19 May 2016, at 13:22, Vladimir.S via swift-evolution <swift-evolution at swift.org> wrote:
>>
>> On 19.05.2016 0:01, Michael Peternell wrote:
>>>> Not Fun To Debug bits (similar to the dispatching rules of protocol
>>>> extensions default methods).
>>> There are dispatching rules of protocol extension default methods? I
>>> thought the methods are selected randomly... just kidding -
>>
>> [offtopic]
>> Could you please describe the joke and the problem of 'dispatching rules of protocol extensions default methods'? Want to clarify this for myself. Thank you.
>> [/offtopic]
>> _______________________________________________
>> swift-evolution mailing list
>> swift-evolution at swift.org
>> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
More information about the swift-evolution
mailing list