[swift-evolution] [Review] SE-0090: Remove .self and freely allow type references in expressions

T.J. Usiyan griotspeak at gmail.com
Tue May 17 22:56:40 CDT 2016


Could we reconsider rejecting the uppercase and lowercase conventions as a
syntactic requirement? While I still disagree with enum cases not being
UpperCamelCase, that decision narrows the 'approved' enough that the
syntactic requirement would line up with guidance. It would also make
teaching the conventions much easier. New students who, for whatever
reason, prefer naming variables with upper camel case would have immediate
and concrete feedback from the dev tools that that is non-idiomatic.


If that is a non starter, let me try another. Was a disambiguating token
preceding the type reference considered?

On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 11:33 PM, Chris Lattner via swift-evolution <
swift-evolution at swift.org> wrote:

> Hello Swift community,
>
> The review of "SE-0090: Remove .self and freely allow type references in
> expressions" begins now and runs through May 23. The proposal is available
> here:
>
>
> https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/0090-remove-dot-self.md
>
> Reviews are an important part of the Swift evolution process. All reviews
> should be sent to the swift-evolution mailing list at
>
>         https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
>
> or, if you would like to keep your feedback private, directly to the
> review manager.
>
> What goes into a review?
>
> The goal of the review process is to improve the proposal under review
> through constructive criticism and contribute to the direction of Swift.
> When writing your review, here are some questions you might want to answer
> in your review:
>
>         * What is your evaluation of the proposal?
>         * Is the problem being addressed significant enough to warrant a
> change to Swift?
>         * Does this proposal fit well with the feel and direction of Swift?
>         * If you have used other languages or libraries with a similar
> feature, how do you feel that this proposal compares to those?
>         * How much effort did you put into your review? A glance, a quick
> reading, or an in-depth study?
>
> More information about the Swift evolution process is available at
>
>         https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/process.md
>
> Thank you,
>
> -Chris Lattner
> Review Manager
>
> _______________________________________________
> swift-evolution mailing list
> swift-evolution at swift.org
> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.swift.org/pipermail/swift-evolution/attachments/20160517/50e0d255/attachment.html>


More information about the swift-evolution mailing list