[swift-evolution] Idea: Named extensions
Brandon Knope
bknope at me.com
Mon May 16 11:26:38 CDT 2016
I like to separate methods into their own logical extensions so similar methods are grouped together. I do this mostly with Cocoa Touch where I like all view life cycle methods to be in the same extension:
extension ViewController {
override func viewDidLoad() {
}
override func viewWillAppear(animated: Bool) {
}
override func viewDidDisappear(animated: Bool) {
}
}
You can document this somewhat by adding a MARK comment:
// MARK: Lifecylce
extension ViewController {
override func viewDidLoad() {
}
override func viewWillAppear(animated: Bool) {
}
override func viewDidDisappear(animated: Bool) {
}
}
What if we made this more self-documenting by elevating this to a language feature?
extension ViewController named Lifecycle {
override func viewDidLoad() {
}
override func viewWillAppear(animated: Bool) {
}
override func viewDidDisappear(animated: Bool) {
}
}
Other ways:
extension named Lifecycle ViewController { }
extension named “View Lifecycle" ViewController { }
extension ViewController named “Multi word description” { }
For now, this is purely a documenting feature (i.e. Can’t refer to the extension name dynamically or statically in actual code). I think it plays much more naturally with Swift than requiring this to be in the comments and would work across all IDEs and make it easier for people to find a specific extension as well as making their code more self documenting.
Any thoughts?
Thanks,
Brandon
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.swift.org/pipermail/swift-evolution/attachments/20160516/c5be0ee6/attachment.html>
More information about the swift-evolution
mailing list