[swift-evolution] proposal for a even simpler guard.. => guard!
dominik at pich.info
Tue May 3 01:41:38 CDT 2016
;) yes. I know I can write let x = y! but IMHO THAT is too brief again.
I like the fact that guard makes you look what you do… it is a little bit like assert(x != nil)
guard! let x = y
it reads awesome and everybody can more easily see it is a potentially fatal & important call
> On May 3, 2016, at 1:38 AM, Jordan Rose <jordan_rose at apple.com> wrote:
> We have that; it’s just ‘!’. :-)
>> On May 2, 2016, at 12:09, Dominik Pich via swift-evolution <swift-evolution at swift.org <mailto:swift-evolution at swift.org>> wrote:
>> often the guard statement is used to only unwrap optionals. multiple guards will cause a lot of ‘overhead’.
>> also often if it doesn’t work. there is no easy way we can gracefully recover ;)
>> so how about we do the same as with try/catch where you can use try! and have a guard!
>> the guard! could just throw an exception …
>> swift-evolution mailing list
>> swift-evolution at swift.org <mailto:swift-evolution at swift.org>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the swift-evolution