[swift-evolution] [Pitch] Requiring proactive overrides for default protocol implementations.
matthew at anandabits.com
Thu Apr 28 18:46:04 CDT 2016
Sent from my iPad
> On Apr 28, 2016, at 6:20 PM, Erica Sadun <erica at ericasadun.com> wrote:
>>> On Friday, 29 April 2016, Matthew Johnson via swift-evolution <swift-evolution at swift.org> wrote:
>>> Does that mean the conformance declaration will be accepted by the compiler under your proposal? I would really like to see this called out explicitly in the proposal.
> I'm making live updates at the gist in response to on-list discussions:
> If you have specific suggestions for modifications, I'll be happy to evaluate for incorporation.
Unfortunately I don't have specific suggestions as there are flaws with all of the approaches I can think of. However, I do think *something* needs to be specified regarding behavior when retroactively conforming a type from a different module which doesn't know anything about the protocol but does implement the requirements (as normal methods). I can't determine how I feel about this proposal without seeing it clearly specified.
> -- E
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the swift-evolution