[swift-evolution] [Idea] How to eliminate 'optional' protocol requirements

Brent Royal-Gordon brent at architechies.com
Fri Apr 15 19:24:10 CDT 2016


> That’s the other part of my argument: if it is true that Swift code only needs to conform to ObjC protocols with optional requirements, but Swift code does not need to invoke optional requirements of ObjC protocols except very rarely, then it’s okay for calling-an-optional-requirement not to be part of the Swift language.

How much of a complication is the `methodName?` behavior? If you're confident that `optional` is the wrong choice for protocols designed in the future, perhaps you could just make it impossible to declare a new optional requirement in Swift, but leave the calling behavior as-is?

-- 
Brent Royal-Gordon
Architechies



More information about the swift-evolution mailing list