[swift-evolution] divisible-by operator

[Milos Rankovic]

Thank you for giving this a thought!

milos

> On 7 Apr 2016, at 15:13, Erica Sadun <erica at ericasadun.com> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> On Apr 6, 2016, at 10:13 AM, Milos Rankovic via swift-evolution <swift-evolution at swift.org <mailto:swift-evolution at swift.org>> wrote:
>> 
>> Checking for divisibility is very common:
>> 
>>     21 % 3 == 0 // true
>> 
>> In fact, this is such a common use of the `%` operator that the `== 0` side of the expression seems distracting in this use case. For quite a while now, I’ve been using a custom operator for this, which is steadily growing on me:
>> 
>>     21 %== 3 // true
>> 
>> … which also allows me to overload it for sequences:
>> 
>>     21 %== [7, 3] // true
>> 
>> (If I’m inadvertently misusing this mailing list to share such a minor idea, please tell me off so that I can learn not to do it again!)
>> 
> 
> While modulo checks are common, I don't think that your proposed solution (%==) enhances readability or saves typing *to such extent* that it vastly improves over the existing art:
> 
> 21 % 3 == 0 reads easily from left to right, is quick to type, is understood across many languages.
> 
> 21 %== 3    saves a few spaces, is less immediately understandable (due to the visual overlap with `+=` and `-=`) and would be (as far as I'm aware of) unique to Swift.
> 
> I applaud the thinking and creativity but I would not support the proposal.
> 
> -- E

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.swift.org/pipermail/swift-evolution/attachments/20160407/e1e86c29/attachment.html>