[swift-evolution] My personal beef with leading-dot syntax
erica at ericasadun.com
Mon Apr 4 13:15:30 CDT 2016
> On Apr 4, 2016, at 12:05 PM, Dave Abrahams via swift-evolution <swift-evolution at swift.org> wrote:
> on Mon Apr 04 2016, Erica Sadun <swift-evolution at swift.org> asked:
>> Can you ping me off-list or in another thread and explain what the
>> issues are?
> All of the following make me uncomfortable with our leading-dot thang:
> * The rules for lookup don't seem obvious to me. I admit this is very
> * There is some evidence that people think it means something it doesn't
> (“enum case”), as mentioned in SE-0036. That suggests it is a
> confusing feature. That confusion may be fairly harmless so far, but
> * The dot doesn't seem to buy enough to be worth the complexity it adds
> to the language; why not just let those names be looked up without the
> dot? You can always disambiguate with full qualification if you have
I kind of like the enumeration looking like an enumeration but I get your point.
> * Static members generally are too verbose to access from within members
> of a type (`Self.x` doesn't work; you have to write out
> `TheFullTypeName.x`), and leading-dot doesn't give the ability to do
> so. If we're going to have a special syntax for accessing static
> members, it should *at least* solve this problem.
Just happened to start a thread a little while ago:
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the swift-evolution