[swift-evolution] Deprecating Trailing Closures

William Dillon william at housedillon.com
Thu Mar 24 11:13:51 CDT 2016


> On Mar 24, 2016, at 7:18 AM, Kurt Werle via swift-evolution <swift-evolution at swift.org> wrote:
> 
> Coming from ruby, I'm quite fond of trailing closures.  I couldn't really give you a concrete reason why - putting them in the ()'s really isn't that big a deal.  But I'll say that I move them outside every single time...
> 
> I will say that your examples are the most trivial possible and that the more complex the closure (describing context variables and return types, throws, etc) the uglier it seem to me to put it inside parens.
> 

Agree.

Another thing I like about trailing closures is that it allows me to make custom constructs that feel more like a part of the language.  For example, I really love this extension for NSLock that I have:

extension NSLock {
    func protect(action: (Void) -> Void) {
        self.lock()
        action()
        self.unlock()
    }
}

Now, whenever I need to use my lock, I can just do:

peersLock.protect {
    outputString += "\(self.peers.count) peers:\n"
    for (_, peer) in self.peers {
        outputString += "\(peer)\n"
    }
}

To me, it looks cleaner to me to not have this paren dangling around at the end.  On this one I’d definitely say that if you don’t like it, don’t use it.  I don’t *think* that you’re forced to use it anywhere.  It’s a hard sell to take it away from everyone.

- Will
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.swift.org/pipermail/swift-evolution/attachments/20160324/a9176cb1/attachment.html>


More information about the swift-evolution mailing list