[swift-evolution] SE-0025: Scoped Access Level, next steps

David Hart david at hartbit.com
Thu Mar 24 02:04:16 CDT 2016

I like it very much.

> On 24 Mar 2016, at 06:13, Chris Lattner via swift-evolution <swift-evolution at swift.org> wrote:
> How about we continue this trend, and follow other existing Swift keywords that merge two lowercase words (associatedtype, typealias, etc), and use:
> 	public
> 	moduleprivate
> 	fileprivate
> 	private
> The advantages, as I see them are:
> 1) We keep public and private meaning the “right” and “obvious” things.
> 2) The declmodifiers “read” correctly.
> 3) The unusual ones (moduleprivate and fileprivate) don’t use the awkward parenthesized keyword approach.
> 4) The unusual ones would be “googable”.
> 5) Support for named submodules could be “dropped in” by putting the submodule name/path in parens: private(foo.bar.baz) or moduleprivate(foo.bar).  Putting an identifier in the parens is much more natural than putting keywords in parens.
> What do you all think?

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.swift.org/pipermail/swift-evolution/attachments/20160324/90eb265f/attachment.html>

More information about the swift-evolution mailing list