[swift-evolution] [META] Re-invigorating the compiler directive discussion

[Goffredo Marocchi]

Go go go :)

Sent from my iPhone

> On 14 Mar 2016, at 17:42, Erica Sadun via swift-evolution <swift-evolution at swift.org> wrote:
> 
>> 
>>> On Mar 14, 2016, at 11:34 AM, Joe Groff <jgroff at apple.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On Mar 14, 2016, at 10:33 AM, Erica Sadun <erica at ericasadun.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> On Mar 14, 2016, at 11:28 AM, Joe Groff <jgroff at apple.com> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Mar 12, 2016, at 7:56 PM, Erica Sadun via swift-evolution <swift-evolution at swift.org> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> #if platform(Apple) tests for platform families, including Apple, Linux, Unix, Windows
>>>>> #if imports(UIKit) tests for framework support, differentiating, for example, Mac code from iOS and tvOS code.
>>>>> #if target(simulator) and #if target(device) represent a common categorization requirement, such as Metal, Keychain, and AVFoundation Camera code. 
>>>>> #if target(32bit) and #if target(64bit) tests for 32 and 64 bit architecture families. 
>>>>> #if target(bigendian) and #if target(littleendian) tests for big and little endianness.
>>>>> #if config(debug) tests for debug builds. 
>>>> I agree that expanding our repertoire here is badly needed. I think it'd be better to have a specific #if foo(...) name for each combination of independent choices. It's a nice property of our current design that, when you see #if foo(X) || foo(Y), you know foo(X) and foo(Y) are mutually exclusive. You'd lose that if you had both target(32bit) and target(bigendian).
>>>> 
>>>> -Joe
>>> 
>>> Ah. I was trying to *reduce* the number of distinct fooities. 
>>> 
>>> #if bitwidth(32) and #if bitwidth(64) tests for 32 and 64 bit architecture families. 
>>> #if endian(big) and #if endian(little) tests for big and little endianness.
>>> better?
>>> 
>>> Also, should I break this up into distinct proposals or one core utility group?
>> 
>> IMO I'd split it up.
>> 
>> -Joe
> 
> Prepare for deluge. I'll hold off for a day or two just to see if anyone hates any of these or wants them tweaked or sees something else urgent to add.
> Otherwise, there has been sufficient enthusiasm on a variety of threads and fora to give me confidence to kickstart 'em.
> 
> -- E
> _______________________________________________
> swift-evolution mailing list
> swift-evolution at swift.org
> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.swift.org/pipermail/swift-evolution/attachments/20160314/da4e72cd/attachment.html>